Log in

< back | 0 - 10 |  
mglovesfun [userpic]

Circus Zyair review

September 12th, 2015 (02:41 pm)

Circus Zyair, I said I'd review it but I don't think I can remember all the acts!

First of all, the ticket office had just one woman working on it, which meant we had to queue for about 25 minutes to get in. They had about 4 people checking for tickets when we got in. Um, maybe move one of them into the ticket office?

The show started about 20 minutes late. Standard. And people were still queuing until then.

First act was a handstand act. It was a good act but I would've liked more progression. He did a one hander (both sides) pretty early on and then for me, failed to progress from that. Good act though.

Second act was a good tightrope act. That was good and it had progression. I'm pretty sure when he fell off, the guy who leapfrogged his partner, it was staged because the music stopped about a second after he fell. I've seen an acted with a staged fall before. But the guy had a lot of personality.

From here on I'm probably going to forget a few acts. Just one female act, which is rare. She did aerial rope and she was really good. She did a neck spin (it was an aerial rope with a cord attached for extra tricks). The handstand guy did an aerial straps act, which is where you have two cords and the guy wraps them round his hands and gets hoisted up to various heights in the air.The last act that I can think of of the first half was the diabolo guy, who was really good. It's also nice to have some non-aerial acts as if you get a whole show of them they sort of blend into one a bit and you get bored.

The second half started with a juggler. He was we think the diaboloist from the first half. He wasn't that impressive. He dropped about 4 times. I was sat next to Jon Peat who could probably do that act dropless. The last trick was a 7 ring pulldown which is a hard trick but I've seen 9 done in person.

The aerial rope lady did an aerial swing act. It was a good act and she had a good personality. It's more important than you might think to be able to engage with an audience.

The second-to-last act was the wheel of death. It's basically two very large hollow metal wheels on an axel. It's genuinely dangerous, I've read stories of people dying during practice sessions. He was the tightrope guy and he was amazing. I was genuinely nervous when he did it blindfolded. He did wear a safety wire but you can't, really! Wearing a wire inside a moving metal apparatus that big could be extremely dangerous. Like fatal.

The final act was a motorbike act. The wall of death (or whatever it's called). I've never seen a motorbike act in a circus (apart from on YouTube) and I enjoyed it a lot more than I expected. They got three of them inside the ball which for the size of it was incredible.

The clown was good. He did nothing unusual or out of the ordinary but he was funny and he didn't take ages between the acts. My pet peeve is clowns that take ages when its not needed. And everyone either seemed to be in the show twice or be in one act and do the setup for the other acts. There were only about six performers even though there were 9 acts.

Also, the music was REALLY loud. Like a rave with a circus attached.


mglovesfun [userpic]

What is flow?

August 13th, 2015 (06:04 pm)

We were having a good old debate about flow yesterday on someone else's Timeline and I had so much to say I wanted to put it on my own.

Background: 'flow' is used a Hell of a lot in the hooping community so pinning down what is actually means would be pretty useful.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi coined the term 'flow' in 1975. It has rather a complicated definition in that there are nine criteria to determine whether flow is occurring, and each of those is open to interpretation. Flow is a mental state which is why I find the idea of commenting on someone's 'flow' such a difficult one. How you can you observe someone's mental state?

What's happening here is that flow has other definitions. Yep, big surprise. Flow is etymologically and topically related to fluidity so unsurprisingly, hoopers who use a lot of fluidity in their hooping get comments about their flow.

And why not? Someone picked this out as an error but actually this meaning of the term flow is much older. The psychology term only goes back to 1975 after all, where the link between fluidity and flow goes back over 1000 years.

Now the problem is you have two terms 'flow' with different meanings that overlap in practical terms. In this sense, I'd compare it to 'literally' where the meanings are distinct but interfere with each other.

For instance, my hooping is very start-stop. So there's no much fluidity of movement. But in terms of my mental state, you could well say that I meet all 9 criteria of flow and therefore it is flow. But it sounds odd to say that about someone who's doing the same trick over and over again and stopping in between.


mglovesfun [userpic]

Nigel Richards

July 25th, 2015 (06:14 pm)

Nigel Richards has won the matchplay World Scrabble Championship in French after just 9 weeks of learning the dictionary. He finished second in the duplicate losing just three points on the game but with a 5 point penalty for an erroneous reference. I don't know quite what this means; as far as I can see it should either be a warning (no penalty until the 4th one) or a zero (zero points instead of the full score) whatever this is, I think it must be a rule that's been introduced since I stopped playing about 6 years ago.

I think Nigel Richard's achievement is unique in a couple of ways.

There have certainly been some English-language World Scrabble Champions who don't speak English as a first language, but debatably they all 'speak English'. Some of them probably speak English no better than we educate children to at GCSE for foreign languages.

Thailand has produced two world champions as they teach children to play Scrabble in English as a way to learn English. Clearly whoever came up with this idea knows nothing about competitive Scrabble. It has literally nothing to do with meanings of words or sentence structure or syntax. That's precisely why Thailand has produced two world champions who can literally barely speak English. Mark Nyman commented on the recent documentary that one of the Thai players challenged 'legend' against him. Mostly I find this surprising because 'legends' is a reasonably high probability bonus.

Yes, Scrabble players learn words without meaning based on the probability of them occurring in a game.

So back to Nigel Richards. First of all, Thai Scrabble players don't play in Thai, or even if they do, they can't possibly confuse a Thai word and an English word as they don't use the same alphabet. Nigel has to keep all the English words and all the French words separate in his head.

Secondly I can't believe someone could start from scratch and memorise basically the whole dictionary in 9 weeks. I can imagine someone doing it in 9 years. Though it's not true that he learned to play in 9 weeks; he's got 22 years of experience he's just managed to learn the whole dictionary in 9 weeks and slot it in to his Scrabble brain that's already brought him 3 World Championships.

I would rate Nigel's achievement as easily the greatest achievement in the history of Scrabble, and it's not even close.

There are a few questions now. Will he ever play again in French or just do it for the one tournament. Or will he play more than one tournament a year. How will it effect his English game, if at all? Does he plan on tackling the Spanish or the Catalan World Championships?

Also since he didn't learn any French, what happens if there's a dispute over the rules? Are you allowed a translator or anything?

mglovesfun [userpic]

Sort my life out

May 15th, 2015 (12:49 am)

I've been trying to post this for about a week, but I've been ill. And now it's past midnight so I'm obviously not going to finish tonight either.

I do have some good news. I might be getting a job as a leaflet distributor. It's very odd, or it would seem very odd (I think) to an outside for someone who was the brightest kid in school to then be long-term not working (not unemployed the whole time, but not working) then working as a care assistant, then working.

I mean, someone I went to school with friend requested me on facebook. I was horrified! My feeling is, everyone I went to school with would be really surprised. Not me so much. I remember in school I never had any idea what I wanted to do. My feeling is also, had I not had such serious mental health problems I'd've tried something and I was so talented that I would've succeeded.

I think one of the hardest things is I blame myself in general, but if I try to think of specific things I've done wrong, I literally can't think of one thing. This might sound odd, but if I blame myself it's empowering. Rather than being a victim of fate, it was me, I had the power.

I've been thinking about it, and there are just so many things that could improve if I could get a job and keep it. I've been dabbling in a bit of online dating and I feel like women my age aren't gonna wanna date an unemployed guy. It's different being 31 to 21 in that respect. Money is another reason, self-esteem. Respect (perceived respect) from peers.

That I admit says nothing about how to get a job. That's the hard bit. I might have one; I can't confirm that yet. I think it will be a physically hard job so I'm not sure how many hours to do yet. I haven't even passed the interview yet.


mglovesfun [userpic]

Memory and hoop

January 17th, 2015 (01:01 am)

I'm feeling a bit better about what I previously referred to as 'memory problems'. I put it in inverted commas because being unable to remember something is not necessarily a 'problem'. Also it isn't 'remembering' I'm having trouble with, but recalling.

Remembering is a two part process, the storing and the retrieving. I'm having no problem storing the information, but some problems retrieving it.

I'm not sure how worried to be. I mean, for a while now I've been feeling like I will start to decline early, especially mentally. I mean, I was always very mature growing up and that wasn't really a good thing. I could easily pass for 18 when I was 16 and get served in pubs without getting IDed. So, I feel like for the same reasons I might start declining mentally earlier than most too. Not this early I admit.

It could easily just be a phase. That things could improve if I move out, maybe get a job and/or a girlfriend, that I could then feel better and thus perform better mentally. I've also been saying for a while that my mental peak was at about 14, so I'm 17 years past that now. I mean I know and I understand a Hell of a lot more than when I was 14, but I think for pure processing power that was my peak. In fact what was always my strength, my ability to concentrate, is now my biggest weakness. Perhaps second biggest behind the anxiety attacks.

Hoopwise, hooping has taken over from juggling right now. There's no circus society now until the 26th of January. No way. It's so hard for me to be motivated when it's cold outside and I'm not juggling with other jugglers. I've done like five hours hooping this week.

I'm doing a 'stress management' course, six weeks, about an hour per week (with a break, about 1hr 10). Of course I suffer with anxiety, not stress, but basically the idea is that stress causes anxiety, therefore it's relevant to me. It's going okay, I would say it doesn't suit me. It understandably seeks to combat common stress and anxiety problems. Mine are atypical, or at least they seem to be from what little I know. It's not about comparing myself to others, it's about treatment. Uncommon problem, harder to know how to treat it.

I'll review the course when I've done all of it. Two weeks to go, I missed the first week but I have the handout from it.


mglovesfun [userpic]

Happy New Year

January 2nd, 2015 (12:33 am)

I'll initially repost what I said on facebook:

"New Year's resolutions.
Take more risks! I've become incredibly risk averse! I think as someone who suffers from pretty serious anxiety problems, if you find something you enjoy and doesn't make you anxious, keep doing it! So I do the same things a lot! But it does get quite boring. It's driving me nuts.
To move out, again, I've been living with my mum since 2010 now and while at first as in the first couple of years I think I definitely needed the support, I think I don't now. I mean not the same type of support, I'm not saying I don't want support from my family because I do. Subsection of this, get a cat.
Get fitter. It seems to matter more for hooping than juggling. I'll only be able to get so good without getting fitter.
That's about it, really. #1 and #3 seem extremely achievable, #2 is gonna be a lot harder."

mglovesfun [userpic]

Merry Christmas 2014

December 25th, 2014 (12:49 am)

Like I've said before this blog is kinda dead (or not far off it) because I'm finding I can't concentrate for long enough to write a whole entry in one go. My entries in recent months. Say, since September, are all really short or written in more than one go.

Normally I'd say on the 25th of December it's too early to do a review of the year, but really nothing's happened at all! I've never seen a year go past so quickly. It's frightening. It really feels like a few weeks or maybe a few months, but not 12 months! When you start thinking like that, hey I'm 31 and pretty soon I'll be 40. 9 more years that fly past in a blink of an eye. That's pretty scary.

So I kissed one girl on the 1st of January at a party and that's been it. Though the year before that I think it was zero. I think I even blogged it was zero and I haven't made that many entries in the last year so it would be easy to look up.

I don't think I've met a potential girlfriend this year. That excludes people I already knew, of which two come to mind who I think would be good girlfriends. I can think of a third woman who I had a crazy mad crush on but that was hormonal rather than logic.

But I know what's going wrong, and that's a massive first step. I've become incredibly risk averse. That I can think of, I've asked out one girl this year. And that was on facebook because I didn't have the courage to do it in person.

It's kind of a natural defence mechanism for someone who suffers from anxiety to do the same things over and over. It's not that new things scare me so much as failure scares me. I now do things that I don't fail at. I know when I fail, it takes me like months rather than weeks or days to recover from it.

Yet I'm committed to try and move out again in 2015 though I don't really know how. I feel like I have to try. Possibly not live on my own, perhaps I couldn't afford it. A job would be good obviously but I don't consider that a realistic goal in the near future so it's in the long-term projects pile.

But really, I think just mentally, I need to take more risks! Go on more nights out, go to circus conventions that are miles away. I used to be so unafraid, now it's the opposite!


mglovesfun [userpic]

Scrabble: A Night on the Tiles

December 11th, 2014 (07:32 pm)


I very much enjoyed this documentary about the origins of Scrabble and how it's played now. It's so right about a lot of things. There was quite a lot in there I didn't know. I knew that Alfred Mosher Butts invented Scrabble, but I didn't know there was a middle phase to the story. The way I knew it, he invented it and then it was discovered by Macy's. But there was more than a ten year gap! And in fact Lexico was not a former name of the board game Scrabble, but a predecessor with similar equipment and rules.

I very rarely think about it now, but I was a player for about 5 years. I did enter a few tournaments but relatively not that many. I was primarily an online player but felt the need to prove myself by playing live tournaments, because Internet Scrabble in particular is a cheat's paradise and there aren't any reliable ways to tell a good player apart from a cheat.

I think it would be very different if I started again today.

Firstly my concentration span is so bad I don't know if I could play. I mean, you can switch off during your opponent's turn which I highly recommend. In a tournament you might play 6 games in a day, or even in one particular tournament 16 games in two days. Each game you get 25 minutes thinking time each, so a theoretical maximum of 50 minutes per game (I say theoretical, it is possible to neutralize the clock so you can go over 50 minutes).

Ignoring that, I remember joining the UK Scrabble forum. Um, total shambles I'm afraid. People at each other's throats constantly, people who knew each other in real life too! Plus now, I wouldn't be so keen to prove myself. I mean I like to record my juggling achievements on camera but not to prove myself to anyone, not even myself. It's nice to have a record of good things that you can watch whenever I want to. Furthermore with counting catches, sometimes you don't know how many catches you have, but if you film it you can replay it and do slow-motions and count catches as many times as you like. Finally you can see what it looks like to others and spot flaws in your own technique. So basically recording your own juggling is an all-round win.

I think I found out that playing Scrabble in person is expensive and quite boring. I remember thinking after 4 games of a 6 game tournament that I was both tired and bored and basically had to try hard to concentrate to not quit in the last two games. Plus with travel and staying overnight (the last one is optional of course) you're paying at least £50 which is as much as the first prize is. In fact, you can win the tournament and operate at an overall loss. Not only 'can' but even the world's best players aren't professionals because there isn't enough money in it; they're winning thousands and spending more than that on travel and accommodation.

So I was really an Internet player. Playing socially in person was cool too but I was a bit too good for the people around me. I had one person come to my house called Mark who was really good but also really sort of weird and boring and I never invited him round again.


mglovesfun [userpic]


October 28th, 2014 (11:10 pm)

I've taken an age to get round to this. And I'm going to say why and then make it relevant.

A couple of things, one is that I'm usually pretty busy (though not always) and most of my free time in front of the computer is on facebook or watching old tennis videos on YouTube. In fact I've just finished the 2011 Australian Open final, moving on next to the 2011 Wimbledon finally. I'm yet to find any US or French Open finals on YouTube, though I've seen quite a lot of Wimbledon and Australian Open ones. In fact all the Wimbledon finals since 2003.

Also I have a lot of trouble concentrating on anything involving reading or writing. This is where it starts getting relevant.

I've left Citizen's Advice Bureau. I didn't see it coming.

Edit: I couldn't even finish this blog post in one go, I've had to save it and come back to it.

But anyway, I didn't realize how academic the qualification was going to be. In fact, I didn't even realize I was going to be doing an academic course at all. It wasn't what I thought I'd signed up for at all. So I was disappointed and I think it would have been in their best interests to say what the course involved, I can't imagine any scenario where it wouldn't be.

The issue really was concentration. I can probably concentrate for about 30 minutes before I need a 30 minute break. So again I've learned something from a voluntary job, something useful, but what I've learned is jobs not to apply for because I won't be able to do them. It's not all that long ago I was applying for admin jobs!

I think in fairness, applying for admin jobs in 2010-2011 it was quite different back then, because I could concentrate for a lot longer. It's a bit worrying in one sense. People might think I'm joking when I talk about early onset dementia. Well I'm not. I mean not now but, y'know, the way my life has gone I wouldn't be at all surprised if I was suffering with dementia at 40.

So after saying in 2012 it would never happen again, I'm not ESA (Employment and Support Allowance). I think sadly it's the right choice as with the panic attacks, lack of concentration, early onset of tiredness there's no job I could actually get and retain.

It's the two issues; getting a job in the first place, then retaining it. I discovered in 2013 that 20 hours a week at something I was good at and enjoyed was beyond my limits.

That's it really. So, no good news. I mean, I'm fine, my pride is hurt, but a bruised ego's not the worst thing in the world.


mglovesfun [userpic]

Ched Evans

October 19th, 2014 (04:02 pm)

This is a blog post about the convictions and subsequent release of the footballer Ched Evans.

A few things before we get started. He's been convicted and served his sentence. Or more accurately he's served his custodial sentence, he still has another 2 and a half years on probation.

Trials aren't about what actually happened, they're about evidence. That is to say, juries make their decision on the evidence they have in front of them, they can't travel in time and space to be there when the alleged offence happened. The other things trials are about are juries. Juries are the unknown, the decision-makers without any legal training or experience. And I think sometimes why convictions get ruled unsafe, it's because of this.

I'm not a legal expert and I haven't seen all of the evidence in the Ched Evans case. There are a few things. Let's start with what the law says

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,

(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and

(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.

(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.


Most noticeably when I first read this, all rapists are men. Or biologically men if you want to include transgender people with a penis. Also as alluded to above, section 75:

(2) The circumstances are that—

(a) any person was, at the time of the relevant act or immediately before it began, using violence against the complainant or causing the complainant to fear that immediate violence would be used against him;

(b) any person was, at the time of the relevant act or immediately before it began, causing the complainant to fear that violence was being used, or that immediate violence would be used, against another person;

(c) the complainant was, and the defendant was not, unlawfully detained at the time of the relevant act;

(d) the complainant was asleep or otherwise unconscious at the time of the relevant act;

(e) because of the complainant’s physical disability, the complainant would not have been able at the time of the relevant act to communicate to the defendant whether the complainant consented;

(f) any person had administered to or caused to be taken by the complainant, without the complainant’s consent, a substance which, having regard to when it was administered or taken, was capable of causing or enabling the complainant to be stupefied or overpowered at the time of the relevant act.


Curiously the Act goes into quite a lot of detail as to what consent isn't but doesn't mention in the slightest what consent is, so 'consent' maintains its normal definition.

Really the first curiosity about this case is the victim doesn't know whether she consented or not. From what I understand, she was very drunk, though this doesn't fall under section 75 (2) (f) above because the footballer isn't the one who gave her the alcohol. 75 (2) (d) seems also not to apply in that there's no evidence she was unconscious at the time. She doesn't remember and the last footage of her on CCTV shows her conscious.

So I suppose it's down to the CCTV footage. Drunken consent is consent, so she'd have to be so drunk as to not be able to understand what was going on. Given the last footage of her was in the hotel lobby not the hotel room, I'm surprised there's enough evidence to show she was incapable of consent. Again, it's not knowable whether she consented or not because she doesn't remember, so the only way to be sure she didn't consent is if she was incapable. And I'm surprised the jury feels like they can know that beyond a reasonable doubt based on CCTV before the incident happened.

Again, this is not condoning his actions, it's an analysis of the evidence as I see it and how the evidence fits with the statutes of this country.


< back | 0 - 10 |